Sustainable Development in Sports

Sustainable Development in Sports

Subhash Chandak

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Amita M. Nishmitha

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Abstract

The paper draws from relevant literature and two original case studies, and analyses five main processes involved in Sustainable Development in Sports.This paper is a review on efforts needed to reposition University sports. If sports would meet the global best practice, then attempts must be made upgrade sport facilities in the universities. Provide coaches with the requisite training and certification. The University Games Association being the umbrella organization for university sports must organize sports in division level. The greatest challenge for sports growth which has to do with sponsorship and branding has to be pursued with utmost vigor and determination. Private and corporate organization must come to the aid of University Sports by carrying out their corporate social responsibility through building of sports facilities.

Keywords

Repositioning sports, Sustainability, University sports

To cite this article

Chandak, S., & Nishmitha, A.M. (2017). Sustainable Development in Sports, International Journal of  Management, and Social Sciences Review (IJMSSR). Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.1-18. Doi:10.5281/zenodo.2648103

 

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

References

  1. Adams, A. 2008. “Building organisational and management capacity for the delivery of sports development”. In Management of sports development, Edited by: Girginov, V. 213–225. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  1. Al-Tauqi, M. 2003. Olympic solidarity: global order and the diffusion of modern sport between 1961 to 1980, Unpublished PhD thesis. Loughborough University. [Google Scholar]
  1. Bagheri, A. and Hjorth, P. 2007. Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustainable development, 15: 83–96. [Crossref][Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Balogun, J., Huff, A. S. and Johnson, P. 2003. Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing. Journal of management studies, 40(1): 197–224. [Crossref][Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Becker, H. 1966.  Studies in the sociology of deviance, New York: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  1. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. 1971. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, London: Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  1. Bernstein, H. 2006. Studying development/development studies. African studies, 65(1): 45–62. [Google Scholar]
  1. Cantelon, H. and Letters, M. 2000. The making of the IOC environmental policy as the third dimension of the Olympic Movement. International review for the sociology of sport, 35(3): 294–308. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Chalip, L., Thomas, D. R. and Voyle, J. 1996. “Enhancing wellbeing through sport and recreation”. In Community psychology and social change, 2nd, Edited by: Thomas, D. and Veno, A. 126–156. Palmerston North, NZ: The Dunmore Press. [Google Scholar]
  1. Coakley, J. 1998. Sport in society: Issues and controversies, 6th, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  1. Coalter, F. 2004. “Stuck in the blocks. A sustainable sporting legacy?”. In After the goldrush: a sustainable Olympics for London, Edited by: Vigor, A., Mean, M. and Tims, C. 91–109. London: IPPR and Demos. [Google Scholar]
  1. Coalter, F. 2007. A wider social role for sport. Who’s keeping the score?, Oxford: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  1. Collins, M. 2003. Sport and social exclusion, London: Routledge. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Collins, M. 2008. “Public policies on sports development: can mass and elite sport hold together”. In Management of sports development, Edited by: Girginov, V. 59–89. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  1. Community Health Survey, 2003. Queen Mary University, Research with East LondonAdolescents. [Google Scholar]
  1. Coubertin, P. de. April 1911. Olympic ReviewApril, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  1. Cowen, M. and Shenton, R. 1995. “The invention of development”. In Power of development, Edited by: Crush, J. 27–44. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  1. Cowen, M. and Shenton, R. 1996. Doctrines of development, New York: Routledge. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Crass Ross Dawson. 2007. The Olympic legacy: qualitative research into public attitudes, London: Crass Ross Dawson. [Google Scholar]
  1. DCMS (Department of Culture, Media Sport). 2002. Game plan, London: DCMS. [Google Scholar]
  1. 2007. Our promise for 2012: How the UK will benefit from the Olympic and Paralympic Games, London: DCMS. [Google Scholar]
  1. 2008. Before, during and after: making the most of the London 2012 Games, London: DCMS. [Google Scholar]
  1. Dimitrov, R. 2003. Knowledge, power and interests in environmental regime formation. International studies quarterly, 47: 123–150. [Crossref][Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Dresner, S. 2003. The principles of sustainability, London: Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  1. Duke, V. and Golley, L. 1996. Football, nationalism and the state, New York: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  1. Durkheim, E. 1961. The elementary forms of the religious life, New York: Collier Books. [Google Scholar]
  1. Esteva, G. 1997. “Development”. In The development dictionary, Edited by: Sachs, W. London: Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  1. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 2001. Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual review of political science, 4: 391–416. [Crossref][Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]
  1. Frisby, W. and Millar, S. 2002. The actualities of doing community development to promote the inclusion of low income population in local sport and recreation. European sport management quarterly, 2: 209–233. [Google Scholar]
  1. Girginov, V. 2008. Management of sports development, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  1. Girginov, V. and Hills, L. 2008. The 2012 London Olympic Games and participation in sport: understanding the link. The international journal of the history of sport, 25(14): 2091–2116. [Google Scholar]
  1. Girginov, V. and Parry, J. 2005. The Olympic Games explained, London: Routledge. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Gold, J. and Gold, M. 2008. Olympic cities: regeneration, city rebranding and changing urban agendas. Geography compass, 2(1): 300–318. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Gratton, C. and Henry, I. 2001. Sport in the city: the role of sport in economic and social regeneration, London: E. & F.N. Spon. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Green, C. 2008. “Sport as an agent for social and personal change”. In Management of sports development, Edited by: Girginov, V. 129–147. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  1. Green, M. 2007. Olympic glory or grassroots development? Sport policy priorities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, 1960–2006. The international journal of the history of sport, 24(7): 921–953. [Google Scholar]
  1. Greene, J. 2000. “Understanding social programmes through evaluation”. In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  1. Guba, E. 1990. The paradigm dialogue, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  1. Haas, P. 2004. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of european public policy, 11(4): 569–592. [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Hammesley, M. 1995. The politics of social research, London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  1. Haq, M. ul. 1995. Reflections on human development, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  1. Held, D. 2006. Reframing global governance: apocalypse soon or reform!. The new political economy, 11(2): 157–176. [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. HM Government. 2007. Securing the future: delivering the UK sustainable development strategy, London: HM Government. [Google Scholar]
  1. Hjorth, P. and Bagheri, A. 2005. Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach. Futures, 38(1): 74–92. [Google Scholar]
  1. Jowell, T., 2006. What social legacy of 2012? Speech at the Fabian Fringe in Manchester,27 September. http://fabians.org.uk/events/event-reports/what-social-legacy-of-2012[Google Scholar]
  1. Lincoln, Y. 2001. “Engaging sympathies: relationships between action research and social constructivism”. In Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice, Edited by: Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. 124–132. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  1. Lorentzen, A. 2005. Strategies of learning in the process of transformation. European planning studies, 13(7): 1013–1033. [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Nicholson, M. and Hoye, R. 2008. Sport and social capital, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  1. Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R. 2005. The theory of knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and corporate change, 14(3): 419–436. [Crossref][Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  1. Pitsis, T., Clegg, S., Marosszeky, M. and Rura-Polley, T. 2003. Constructing the Olympic dream: a future perfect strategy of project management. Organization science, 14(5): 574–590. [Crossref][Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]